4.4 Article

Heavy Precipitation over Italy from the Mediterranean Storm Vaia in October 2018: Assessing the Role of an Atmospheric River

期刊

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
卷 148, 期 9, 页码 3571-3588

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-20-0021.1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mediterranean storm Vaia developed within a typical autumn synoptic circulation, generally associated with heavy rain conditions over the western Mediterranean Sea basin. Intense precipitation was responsible for floods over Italy between 27 and 30 October 2018, and the storm was accompanied by explosive cyclogenesis, storm surge, and extremely intense wind gusts that caused casualties and extensive damage, especially to the Alpine forests. This study investigates the contribution of different moisture sources to the extreme precipitation by means of numerical model simulations using the Bologna Limited Area Model (BOLAM). In particular, the attention is focused on the significant amount of water vapor transported into the Mediterranean basin from the Atlantic Ocean tropical area and organized along a narrow corridor across the African continent. First, a newly developed detection algorithm is applied to identify this transport as an atmospheric river (AR). Then, the implementation of an atmospheric water budget diagnostic, supported by sensitivity experiments, allows us to assess the role of the AR in terms of water supply to the precipitation systems. Although the transport of moisture from remote regions is known to be an important ingredient for the onset of heavy precipitation in the Mediterranean, the role of ARs, already identified in correspondence with some of these events, has not been deeply investigated and quantified yet in this specific area. The results demonstrate that the AR was critical for determining the magnitude of this heavy precipitation episode over Italy, whereas evaporation from the sea played a secondary role, especially for precipitation over the Alps.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据