4.6 Article

Tannin-Rich Plants as Natural Manipulators of Rumen Fermentation in the Livestock Industry

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 25, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25122943

关键词

bioactive compounds; cattle; legumes; sustainable

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico -CNPq)
  2. Universal Notice MCTI/CNPq [405776/2016-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Condensed tannins (CTs) are plant anti-herbivore compounds with antimicrobial activity that can be used in ruminant diets as ruminal microbiome manipulators. However, not all CTs from fodder legumes are bioactive due to their wide structural diversity. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of 10 CT-containing plants(Flemingia macrophylla,Leucaena leucocephala,Stylosanthes guianensis,Gliricidia sepium,Cratylia argentea,Cajanus cajan,Desmodium ovalifolium,Macrotiloma axilare, D. paniculatum, andLespedeza procumbens) on in vitro fermentation kinetics of Nelore beef cattle. Polyethylene glycol (PEG), a specific CT-binding agent, was added to neutralize condensed tannin. Tifton and alfalfa hay were used as controls lacking CT. The experimental layout included a randomized complete block with factorial design and four blocks. The data were subjected to analysis of variance followed by Duncan's test to determine differences (p < 0.05) among treatment means. The addition of PEG in browse incubations resulted in increased gas production, fermentation rate, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) and N-NH(3)release. Within our study,Lespedeza procumbens,Desmodium paniculatum,Leucaena leucocephala,Desmodium ovalifolium, andFlemingia macrophyllashowed superior bioactivity compared to other species evaluated, suggesting a natural alternative for replacing ionophores to modify ruminal fermentation. Condensed tannins fromL. pocumbens,D. paniculatum,L. leucocephala,D. ovalifolium, andF. macrophyllahave the potential to modify rumen fermentation in beef cattle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据