4.5 Article

Pistacia integerrima alleviated Bisphenol A induced toxicity through Ubc13/p53 signalling

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 47, 期 9, 页码 6545-6559

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-020-05706-x

关键词

BPA; Toxicity; Antioxidants; Pistacia integerrimagall; Environmental toxicant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to environmental toxicants such as Bisphenol A (BPA) has raised serious health issues globally particularly in developing countries. It is ubiquitously used in the manufacturing of canned food and feeding bottles. BPA generated reactive oxygen species can lead to several diseases including cardiotoxicity. However, the endpoints stimulated in BPA cardiotoxicity yet need to be investigated. The current study was aimed to investigate the underlying molecular pathways which may contribute in revealing the protective effects ofPistacia integerrimaagainst BPA induced oxidative stress. The dose of 100 mu g/kg BW of BPA, 200 mg/kg BWP. integerrima,and 4 mg/kg BW melatonin was administered to Sprague Dawley rats. Present results of western blotting and qRT-PCR showed the increased expression of p53, PUMA and Drp1, while downregulation of Ubc13 in heart tissues of BPA treated group whereas the levels were reversed upon treatment withP. integerrima. The role of BPA in heart tissue apoptosis was further confirmed by the increased level of P-p53, cytochrome C and disrupted cellular architecture whereas theP. integerrimahas shown its ameliorative potential by mitigating the adverse effects of BPA. Moreover, the oxidant, antioxidant, lipid, and liver markers profile has also revealed the therapeutic potential ofP. integerrimaby maintaining the levels in the normal range. However, melatonin has also manifested the normalized expression of apoptotic markers, biochemical markers, and tissue architecture. Conclusively, the data suggest thatP. integerrimamay be a potential candidate for the treatment of BPA induced toxicity by neutralizing the oxidative stress through Ubc13/p53 pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据