4.6 Article

Phage display screening identifies a novel peptide to suppress ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo in mouse models

期刊

BMC CANCER
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1891-8

关键词

Phage display; Peptide; Ovarian cancer; Tumor cell viability; Invasion; Adhesion; Nude mouse tumor model

类别

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [S2012010009341]
  2. Bureau of Science and Technology of Guangzhou Municipality, China [11A53150713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ovarian cancer is a possibly lethal gynecological malignancy and this study utilized phage display technology to screen and identify peptides that specifically bind to ovarian cancer cells and explored the effects of these peptides on ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Methods: The phage displayed peptide library was used to isolate the peptides binding to and internalizing into the ovarian carcinoma cells. Positive phage clones were characterized with DNA sequencing and bioinformatics analysis and then validated with immunofluorescence. Subsequently, the selected peptides were investigated for their cancer related functions, including cell adhesion, spreading, motility, and invasion in vitro and in vivo. Results: Peptide1 read as SWQIGGNwas the positive peptide and showed preferential binding to the target cells. Peptide 1 also inhibited cell proliferation, migration, invasion and adhesion of ovarian cancer HO8910 cells in vitro. In vivo, Peptide 1 led to a lower tumorigenicity of HO8910 cells, which was characterized by the inhibitory effect on tumor growth and metastasis of ovarian cells. Conclusion: These studies demonstrate that the phage display identified tumor cell binding peptide was able to control ovarian cancer cell viability, migration, invasion, and adhesion capacity in vitro as well as tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Future studies will be aimed at evaluating the clinical efficacy of the peptide SWQIGGN in ovarian cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据