4.7 Article

Crowdsourcing HIV Test Promotion Videos: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial in China

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 62, 期 11, 页码 1436-1442

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw171

关键词

crowdsourcing; HIV; testing; men who have sex with men; China

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), US National Institutes of Health [1R01AI114310 01]
  2. University of North Carolina (UNC)-South China STD Research Training Centre (Fogarty International Center) [1D43TW009532-01]
  3. UNC Center for AIDS Research (NIAID) [5P30AI050410-13]
  4. University of California, San Francisco Center for AIDS Research (NIAID) [P30 AI027763]
  5. National Institute of Mental Health [R00MH093201]
  6. UNC Chapel Hill
  7. Johns Hopkins University
  8. Morehead School of Medicine
  9. Tulane University Fogarty Fellowship (FIC) [R25TW0093]
  10. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences at the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR001111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Crowdsourcing, the process of shifting individual tasks to a large group, may enhance human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing interventions. We conducted a noninferiority, randomized controlled trial to compare first-time HIV testing rates among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender individuals who received a crowdsourced or a health marketing HIV test promotion video. Methods. Seven hundred twenty-one MSM and transgender participants (>= 16 years old, never before tested for HIV) were recruited through 3 Chinese MSM Web portals and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 videos. The crowdsourced video was developed using an open contest and formal transparent judging while the evidence-based health marketing video was designed by experts. Study objectives were to measure HIV test uptake within 3 weeks of watching either HIV test promotion video and cost per new HIV test and diagnosis. Results. Overall, 624 of 721 (87%) participants from 31 provinces in 217 Chinese cities completed the study. HIV test uptake was similar between the crowdsourced arm (37% [114/307]) and the health marketing arm (35% [111/317]). The estimated difference between the interventions was 2.1% (95% confidence interval, -5.4% to 9.7%). Among those tested, 31% (69/225) reported a new HIV diagnosis. The crowdsourced intervention cost substantially less than the health marketing intervention per first-time HIV test (US$131 vs US$238 per person) and per new HIV diagnosis (US$415 vs US$799 per person). Conclusions. Our nationwide study demonstrates that crowd sourcing may be an effective tool for improving HIV testing messaging campaigns and could increase community engagement in health campaigns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据