4.6 Article

Frontier Molecular Orbital Based Analysis of Solid-Adsorbate Interactions over Group 13 Metal Oxide Surfaces

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 124, 期 28, 页码 15355-15365

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04480

关键词

-

资金

  1. JST-CREST [JPMJCR17J3]
  2. KAKENHI from JSPS [17H01341, 18K14051, 18K14057]
  3. MEXT [JPMXP0112101003]
  4. IRCCS
  5. JSPS [P19059]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K14051, 18K14057] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption is an essential process that takes place in heterogeneous catalysis. In the current study, solid-adsorbate interactions occurring between a variety of small molecules and surfaces of group beta metal oxides, including beta-Ga2O3(100), beta-Ga2O3(001), theta-Al2O3 (100), theta-Al2O3 (001), theta-Al2O3 (010), In2O3(110), and In2O3(111), were investigated using density functional theory calculations and a machine learning (ML)-based statistical method. The adsorbates utilized for this purpose include CO, CO2, ND NH3, H2O, acetonitrile, acetone, acetamide, acetic acid, alkanes, alkenes, aromatic compounds, alcohols, and amines. The results show that the adsorption energies (E-ads) of each metal oxide surface correlate linearly with the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energies of the adsorbates and not with energies of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the small molecules. Moreover, in these systems, contributions to molecular adsorption are dominated by interactions between the HOMOs of the adsorbates and the surface conduction band of the metal oxides. Furthermore, the surface energy was found to be an important parameter influencing E-ads values of different metal oxides. Finally, the results of statistical analysis using a ML approach confirmed that adsorbate HOMOs and surface energy of metal oxides are the most influential factors governing molecular adsorption, and also demonstrated that dipole moments of adsorbates contribute to controlling to adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据