4.3 Article

Breast cancer screening controversies: who, when, why, and how?

期刊

CLINICAL IMAGING
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 279-282

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.05.017

关键词

Breast cancer screening; Mammography; Tomosynthesis; Automated whole-breast ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammographic screening is effective in reducing mortality from breast cancer. The issue is not whether mammography is effective, but whether the false positive rate and false negative rates can be reduced. This review will discuss controversies including the reduction in breast cancer mortality, overdiagnosis, the ideal screening candidate, and the optimal imaging modality for breast cancer screening. The article will compare and contrast screening mammography, tomosynthesis, whole-breast screening ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and molecular breast imaging. Though supplemental imaging modalities are being utilized to improve breast cancer diagnosis, mammography still remains the gold standard for breast cancer screening. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据