4.1 Article

Uruguayan Citizens' Perception of Messages to Promote Healthy Eating Through the Use of Nutritional Warnings

期刊

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
卷 52, 期 10, 页码 918-927

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2020.05.012

关键词

front-of-pack; nutrition labeling; public policy; message framing

资金

  1. UNICEF-Uruguay
  2. Espacio Interdisciplinario (Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay)
  3. Instituto Nacional de Alimentacion (Ministerio de Desarrollo Social)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore the specific type of messages people consider most appropriate for a mass communication campaign aimed to promote healthy eating in the context of the implementation of nutritional warnings. Design: Online study including multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Setting: Uruguay, 1 of the Latin American countries with the highest prevalence of overweight and obesity. Participants: A total of 859 participants were recruited using social media. They were diverse in terms of gender, age, educational level, socioeconomic status, and self-reported body mass index. Phenomenon of Interest: Participants were presented with 3 series of messages and were asked to select the 1 they perceived as the most appropriate and to provide a brief explanation for their selection. Analysis: Descriptive statistics for the multiple-choice questions and inductive coding for the responses to the open-ended questions. Results: Participants tended to prefer messages that conveyed a cue to action for achieving changes to their perceived ability to make healthful food choices. Although messages related to the promotion of informed food choices were the most frequently preferred, messages related to negative health consequences and health benefits were also selected repetitively. Conclusions and Implications: Communication campaigns aimed at promoting healthy eating through the use of nutritional warnings could include different contents to target specific segments with different motivations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据