4.2 Article

Advanced Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone)/Graphene-Oxide/Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Composited Membrane with Superior Cyclability for Vanadium Redox Flow Battery

期刊

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 4714-4721

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2020.18503

关键词

Vanadium Flow Battery; Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone); Graphene Oxide; Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles; Hybrid Membrane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702371]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ50654]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [18C0207]
  4. 100 Talented Team of Hunan Province
  5. Open Fund of National Engineering Laboratory of Highway Maintenance Technology (Changsha University of Science Technology) [kfj170105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to improve the repulsion ability of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) membrane for the vanadium ions crossover. For this purpose graphene oxide (GO) nanosheet and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles were employed into the polymer matrix to prepare SPEEK/GO/TiO2 hybrid membrane via solution-casting method for vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB). The morphology, permeability of vanadium ions and device performance of as prepared membrane were investigated and discussed. It was observed that with the barrier block effect by the filler, the VRFB single cell with the optimized SPEEK/GO/TiO2 hybrid membrane exhibited high coulombic efficiency (similar to 99%), excellent energy efficiency (similar to 85%) and vigorous cyclability (similar to 97.2% capacity retention after 100 cycles). Moreover, the VRFB cell with this blend membrane showed lower vanadium ions permeability than Nafion 212 or pure SPEEK membranes. These results demonstrated that the comprehensive properties of hybrid membrane have been remarkably improved comparing to pristine SPEEK which suggested that the hybrid membrane was applicable for VRFB energy storage system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据