4.6 Article

Image-Based Coarse-Aggregate Angularity Analysis and Evaluation

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003150

关键词

Aggregate angularity; Skeleton; Convex hull; Skid resistance; Rut resistance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978071]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Chang'An University, China [300102249301, 300102249306]
  3. Norman W. McLeod Chair in Sustainable Pavement Engineering, Centre for Pavement and Transportation Technology (CPATT), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The angularity of coarse aggregates significantly influences the performance of asphalt pavement. However, the research remains in the qualitative stage, and no universal evaluation standard has been proposed. This research proposes image-based methods to quantitatively analyze the angularity of coarse aggregates, thereby providing corresponding evaluation standards. First, aggregate levels of 4.75-9.5, 9.5-13.2, and 13.2-16 mm were obtained by sieving experiments, which were then abraded 0, 400, 800, and 1,200 times using a Los Angeles abrasion machine. Subsequently, the aggregate particle angularity parameters, including circumference, area, convex hull circumference, convex hull area, and total number of corner points, were calculated. Meanwhile, the aggregate imaging system (AIMS) gradient, skeleton extraction, convex hull, and uncompacted void content (UVC) methods were used to evaluate the angularities of the aggregates. Thereafter, the AC-13C-type mixture test specimens were formed using different angularity aggregates. On this basis, the angularity-related pavement skid resistance and rut resistance tests were conducted. The results show that the skeleton extraction method performs excellently for evaluating all aggregate levels, while the convex hull method is suitable for 9.5- and 13.2-mm aggregates, the AIMS gradient method is suitable for assessing 4.75- and 9.5-mm aggregates, and the UVC method is suitable for assessing 9.5- and 13.2-mm aggregates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据