期刊
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 50-57出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.010
关键词
Delphi method; Reporting guidelines; Research on research; Metaresearch; Clinical epidemiology
资金
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center
Objectives: Previous guidance of reporting guidelines recommends incorporating the Delphi method to integrate the opinions of experts for consensus when developing reporting guidelines. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether reporting guidelines typically use the Delphi method, what factors may be associated with the use of Delphi, and the reporting quality of Delphi. Study Design and Setting: We included all reporting guidelines (n = 244) in the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research (EQUATOR) Network published after January 1, 2011. We assessed the trends and factors associated with conducting Delphi and the reporting quality of Delphi against current reporting guidelines. Results: Of 244, 62 (25%) used Delphi for consensus building. The proportion of reporting guidelines that used Delphi was less than 10% in 2011 and 2012 and 29% in 2019. The year of publication, number of authors, and multiple and simultaneous publications were associated with the use of Delphi. The reporting quality of the Delphi method was moderate in most reporting guidelines developed with Delphi. Conclusions: The use of Delphi in reporting guidelines is insufficient. Users and reviewers should carefully appraise the consensus building in the guidelines. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据