4.7 Article

Panel estimation for the impact factors on carbon dioxide emissions: A new regional classification perspective in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 279, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123637

关键词

China; STIRPAT model; Factor analysis; Ward cluster analysis; Regional classification; CO2 emissions

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11702094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global warming is an urgent issue facing humanity, with China ranking first in CO2 emissions since 2006. This study found that population size, GDP per capita, and energy intensity are the top three factors affecting CO2 emissions in different regions of China. Urbanization has a changing impact on CO2 emissions as it transitions from positive to negative effects.
Global warming is an urgent issue facing humanity. Excessive emissions of CO2 are the leading cause of global climate change. As economy grows, China's CO2 emissions grows rapidly correspondingly. Since 2006, China has ranked first in terms of total CO2 emissions, results of different contributions of different provinces. In view of the shortcomings in the previous regional classification, this work adopted a new regional classification framework which combines factor analysis and Ward clustering method, and classified 30 provinces into four regions by using panel data from 2002 to 2016. Then, this work investigated the regional differences in terms of the effect of population size, GDP per capita, energy structure, energy intensity, urbanization level and industrialization level on CO2 emissions by STIRPAT model. The outcomes indicated that population size, GDP per capita and energy intensity were the top three factors affecting CO2 emissions for all regions. The impact of population size on carbon emissions is not only determined by the size of the population. Along with the process of urbanization, the role of urbanization on CO2 emissions gradually changes from positive to negative. The factor urbanization had positive impacts in region (III and IV) but negative impacts in region (I and II). The greatest positive impacts of energy structure can be seen in region IV. Yet, statistically, energy structure shows no significant impact in region II. As for industrialization level, it demonstrated negative effect in region II but positive effect in the other three regions. From these results, implications for CO2 emission-reduction policies in each region were discussed. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据