4.5 Article

Challenges in Teaching Organic Chemistry Remotely

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
卷 97, 期 9, 页码 3211-3216

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00693

关键词

General Public; Continuing Education; Organic Chemistry; Professional Development; Distance Learning; Stereochemistry

资金

  1. ESTeSL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has changed not only peoples daily lives but also the education system. The rise of e-learning all across the world has challenged both students and teachers to adapt to digital technologies and a novel learning experience on both sides. As if COVID-19 was not enough, many students were facing the alien territory of organic chemistry for the first time. There is no denying that organic chemistry is a tough subject, and several students may also have preconceived misconceptions. In addition, organic chemistry can be challenging to teach remotely. It is very abstract in nature; it involves many concepts, and the teacher typically uses molecular models of one kind or another to depict molecules in three dimensions. Nonetheless, challenges provide an opportunity to implement new strategies to increase students interest, motivation, and understanding. However, most educators only had a few days to put everything they do in class onto an online platform. In this study, we evaluated the effect of these changes in the teaching and learning of organic chemistry at a first year undergraduate level. Our results show that student success depends on the digital resources used for the different subjects. Students that received weekly quizzes performed better than those who did not, and a positive correlation exists between quiz score and final exam marks. Based on the students feedback, the implementation of quizzes was a successful didactic tool that helped them review the topics. In addition, the incorporation of open-access web-based tools led to a dynamic online classroom experience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据