4.7 Article

Prognostic Utility of a New mRNA Expression Signature of Gleason Score

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 81-87

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1245

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. A. David Mazzone Career Development Award
  2. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  3. [CA34944]
  4. [CA40360]
  5. [CA097193]
  6. [HL26490]
  7. [HL34595]
  8. [CA133891]
  9. [UM1CA167552]
  10. [CA136578]
  11. [CA141298]
  12. [CA131945]
  13. [P50CA090381]
  14. [CA09001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Gleason score strongly predicts prostate cancer mortality; however, scoring varies among pathologists, and many men are diagnosed with intermediate-risk Gleason score 7. We previously developed a 157-gene signature for Gleason score using a limited gene panel. Using a new whole-transcriptome expression dataset, we verified the previous signature's performance and developed a new Gleason signature to improve lethal outcome prediction among men with Gleason score 7. Experimental Design: We generated mRNA expression data from prostate tumor tissue from men in the Physicians' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (N = 404) using the Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST microarray. The Prediction Analysis for Microarrays method was used to develop a signature to distinguish high (>= 8) versus low (<= 6) Gleason score. We evaluated the signature's ability to improve prediction of lethality among men with Gleason score 7, adjusting for 3+4/4+3 status, by quantifying the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: We identified a 30-gene signature that best distinguished Gleason score <= 6 from >= 8. The AUC to predict lethal disease among Gleason score 7 men was 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.67-0.84] compared with 0.68 (95% CI, 0.59-0.76) using 3 + 4/4 + 3 status alone (P = 0.0001). This signature was a nonsignificant (P = 0.09) improvement over our previous signature (AUC = 0.72). Conclusions: Our new 30-gene signature improved prediction of lethality among men with Gleason score 7. This signature can potentially become a useful prognostic tool for physicians to improve treatment decision making. (C) 2016 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据