4.7 Article

The physical mechanism of extremely low thermal conductivity of BiCuTeO and BiCuSeO revealed by inelastic neutron and Raman spectroscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 826, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154161

关键词

Inelastic neutron scattering; Raman spectroscopy; Thermal conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51032003, 51872134, 51702132, 51890861, 11890702]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51721001]
  3. National Key R&D Programof China [2016YFA0201104]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20171343]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layered structure BiCuSeO-based compounds have extremely low thermal conductivity about similar to 0.5-0.8 W/m.K, and the corresponding physical origin has been extensively studied by the first-principles calculations. Here we experimentally revealed the physical mechanism of extremely low thermal conductivity in BiCuSeO and BiCuTeO through inelastic neutron and Raman scattering spectroscopy. Generalized phonon density of states (PDOS) characterized by inelastic neutron scattering reveals that the average acoustic-phonon velocities of BiCuSeO and BiCuTeO are as low as 2104 and 1547 m/s, respectively, which are lower than most of normal materials (similar to 3000 m/s), and strong anharmonic effect in BiCuSeO and BiCuTeO. Strongly anharmonic effect is also verified by the large Gruneisen constant of specific optical-phonon mode of BiCuSeO and BiCuTeO (similar to 6.7 in BiCuTeO). The calculated thermal conductivities of BiCuSeO and BiCuTeO by phenomenological thermal conductivity formula, under approximation of the relaxation-time as minimum quasi-particle lifetime of optical-phonon mode, are close to experimental values. Our work sheds more light on the physical mechanism of extremely low thermal conductivity in these compounds. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据