4.2 Article

Evaluation of Point Load Test Effectiveness in Estimation of Long-Term Durability of Some Chinese Limestone Rocks Due to Frost Action

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40995-020-00951-y

关键词

Frost action; Spatial attenuation; Compressional wave velocity; Long-term durability; Deterioration; Limestone rocks

资金

  1. National Key RD Plan [2018YFC0808405, 2018YFC0604401]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51774220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In spite of point load method has been frequently used for assessment of the decay state of stones under weathering agents, its method in estimation of long-term durability of natural rocks remains limited. This study aims to assess the point load method efficiency in evaluation of long-term durability of limestone types due to frost action. For this reason, the frost process up to 100 cycles was applied on different limestone types which quarried from mine in China and the ultrasound properties including compressional wave velocity (Vp) and spatial attenuation (alpha(s)) were determined before and after frost cycles and then their variation rates were obtained. The variation rates ofVp and alpha(s)including Delta Vp and Delta alpha(s), respectively, were taken into consideration as a function of the decay state of stones and as indicators of the frost durability action. The results indicated that there are a strong correlations between point load index values (sigma(p)) and Delta Vp and Delta alpha(s)withR(2)of 0.79 and 0.82, respectively. It was found that the point load method is an effective tool for evaluating the long-term durability of rocks and can be used for a fast and on-field assessment of long-term durability of stones especially at different mine faces. Therefore, it can facilitate the choosing of a highly durable stones for different outdoor applications. Further, the point load index values can be used to make a new classification of rock strength depending on their durability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据