4.6 Article

A tool wear monitoring and prediction system based on multiscale deep learning models and fog computing

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05548-8

关键词

Deep learning; Fog computing; Tool condition monitoring; Convolutional neural network (CNN); Long short-term memory network (LSTM); Multiscale feature learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tool condition monitoring (TCM) during the manufacturing process is of great significance for ensuring product quality and plays an important role in intelligent manufacturing. Current TCM systems deployed in the local device or cloud computing environment unable meet the requirements of low response latency and high accuracy at the same time. The emerging fog computing provides new solutions for the above problem. This paper presents a tool wear monitoring and prediction (TWMP) system based on deep learning models and fog computing. In order to improve monitoring and prediction accuracy, we propose a multiscale convolutional long short-term memory model (MCLSTM) to complete the tool wear monitoring task and a bi-directional LSTM model (BiLSTM) to complete the tool wear prediction task. To reduce the response latency of the TWMP system, we deploy the MCLSTM model and the BiLSTM model in a fog computing architecture. The fog computing architecture consists of an edge computing layer, a fog computing layer, and a cloud computing layer. The edge computing layer undertakes real-time signal collection task. The fog computing layer undertakes real-time tool wear monitoring task. The cloud computing layer with powerful computing resources undertakes intensive computing and latency-insensitive tasks such as data storage, tool wear prediction, and model training. A twist drill wear monitoring and prediction experiment is conducted to test the performance of the proposed system in terms of accuracy, response time, and network bandwidth consumption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据