4.1 Article

A Preliminary Assessment of Skin Microbiome Diversity of Zebrafish (Danio rerio): South African Pet Shop Fish

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 81-84

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12088-020-00900-8

关键词

Danio rerio; Pet shop zebrafish; Skin microbiome; 16S rRNA gene

资金

  1. 50% Special Projects: Central Research Fund (CRF) program of the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences of the University of the Free State

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a preliminary exploration of the skin microbiome of pet shop zebrafish, finding no significant differences between different color morphs, and identifying a core microbiome in zebrafish housed in the laboratory.
The zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a well-known model organism used in an array of scientific research fields. Many microbiome studies conducted on fishes have focused on gut microbiome diversity. To our knowledge, no investigations into the skin microbiome diversity of pet shop zebrafish have been performed. In this pilot study we aimed to assess the microbiome diversity composition of different groups of zebrafish housed at the Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, South Africa. These fish originated from pet shops located in Bloemfontein, South Africa. We investigated the skin microbiome diversity between wild-type zebrafish and the well-known leopard colour morph. The microbiome compositions between zebrafish sexes were also assessed. No significant differences were observed between colour morphs. A core microbiome was identified for the zebrafish housed at our laboratories.Cetobacteriumwas significantly more abundant in females compared to males, withLimnobactermore abundant in males. Both these genera are known components of fish microbiomes, including zebrafish. The precise reason for this link should be further investigated. This research adds to the growing knowledge base linked to aquatic microbiome structure in different habitats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据