4.6 Review

The NLRP1 and CARD8 inflammasomes

期刊

IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS
卷 297, 期 1, 页码 13-25

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imr.12884

关键词

anthrax lethal toxin; CARD8; DPP8; 9; inflammasome; NLRP1; proteasome; pyroptosis; Val-boroPro

资金

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. Ludwig Foundation
  3. Emerson Collective
  4. American Cancer Society [PF-17-224-01 - CCG]
  5. Center for Experimental Therapeutics
  6. Josie Robertson Foundation
  7. National Institutes of Health [F30 CA243444, P30 CA008748, R01 AI137168, T32 GM007739]
  8. Gabrielle's Angel Foundation for Cancer Research
  9. Stand Up To Cancer [SU2C-AACR-IRG11-17]
  10. Pew Charitable Trusts
  11. Pershing Square Sohn Cancer Research Alliance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes that activate inflammatory cytokines and induce pyroptosis in response to intracellular danger-associated signals. NLRP1 and CARD8 are related germline-encoded pattern recognition receptors that form inflammasomes, but their activation mechanisms and biological purposes have not yet been fully established. Both NLRP1 and CARD8 undergo post-translational autoproteolysis to generate two non-covalently associated polypeptide chains. NLRP1 and CARD8 activators induce the proteasome-mediated destruction of the N-terminal fragment, liberating the C-terminal fragment to form an inflammasome. Here, we review the danger-associated stimuli that have been reported to activate NLRP1 and/or CARD8, including anthrax lethal toxin,Toxoplasma gondii, Shigella flexneriand the small molecule DPP8/9 inhibitor Val-boroPro, focusing on recent mechanistic insights and highlighting unresolved questions. In addition, we discuss the recently identified disease-associated mutations in NLRP1 and CARD8, the potential role that DPP9's protein structure plays in inflammasome regulation, and the emerging link between NLRP1 and metabolism. Finally, we summarize all of this latest research and consider the possible biological purposes of these enigmatic inflammasomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据