4.3 Article

Are Inflammatory Biomarkers Increased in Varicose Vein Blood?

期刊

CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 656-664

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1076029616645330

关键词

chronic venous insufficiency; varicose veins; inflammatory cytokines; inflammatory biomarkers; biochip array analysis

资金

  1. Research & Development Department, Ealing Hospital, Middlesex, United Kingdom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To test for the presence of inflammatory biomarkers in blood taken from varicose veins versus antecubital blood of the same patient and compare this to levels in healthy controls. Methods: Using a multiplex biochip array method (Randox, United Kingdom), the interleukins (ILs) IL-1, IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10; vascular endothelial growth factor; interferon , tumor necrosis factor ; monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1); and epidermal growth factor were measured in citrated plasma samples drawn from the arms and legs of 24 patients with varicose veins and 24 controls. Results: Expressed as median (interquartile range) in pg/mL, leg samples from patients with varicose veins had significantly higher levels of IL-8 and MCP-1 compared to their own arm samples (IL-8: local 2.3 [1.71-3.3] vs systemic 2.3 [1.62-2.98], P = .023; MCP-1: local 114.42 [84.29-139.05] vs systemic 103.56 [79.75-126.42], P < .0005). This was not observed in the control group. Leg samples from both patients with varicose vein and controls had higher levels of IL-6 compared to their own arm samples (patients: local 1.67 [0.82-4.48] vs systemic 1.24 [0.58-3.26], P = .002; controls: local 1.23 [0.83-1.7] vs systemic 1.03 [1.7-1.52], P = .005). No significant differences were detected with the other biomarkers. Conclusions: Blood drawn from the site of varicose veins appears to have significantly increased concentrations of IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 when compared to the same patient's arm blood. This supports the hypothesis that inflammation is activated from the tissues drained by the varicose veins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据