4.6 Article

Design and Optimization of Tail-Biting Spatially Coupled Protograph LDPC Codes Under Shuffled Belief-Propagation Decoding

期刊

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 1378-1382

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LCOMM.2020.2985773

关键词

Decoding; Schedules; Prediction algorithms; Convergence; Matrix decomposition; Optimization; Parity check codes; Tail-biting spatially coupled protograph codes; extrinsic information transfer; shuffled decoding

资金

  1. NSF of China [61771149, 61701121, 61471294, 61871132]
  2. Open Research Fund of National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University [2018D02]
  3. NSF of Guangdong Province [2019A1515011465]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201904010124]
  5. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme [2017-ZJ022]
  6. Research Project of the Education Department of Guangdong Province [2017KTSCX060]
  7. Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program [2014ZT05G157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this letter, we conduct a comprehensive investigation on tail-biting (TB) spatially coupled protograph (SC-P) low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes under shuffled belief-propagation (BP) decoding. We first propose a shuffled extrinsic information transfer (S-EXIT) algorithm tailored for the shuffled decoding. Exploiting the proposed algorithm, we accurately predict the convergence performance (i.e., decoding thresholds) for TB-SC-P codes under such a schedule and demonstrate that their convergence performance can be further improved. Based on the S-EXIT analysis, we develop an optimization method to generate a new type of TB-SC-P codes, called improved TB-SC double-protograph (I-TB-SC-DP) codes, which can inherit the superiorities of two mother protograph codes and possess more desirable decoding thresholds. Theoretical analyses and simulated results illustrate that the proposed I-TB-SC-DP codes exhibit better error performance than the existing counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据