4.7 Article

Evaluation of the SediMax automated microscopy sediment analyzer and the Sysmex OF-1000i flow cytometer as screening tools to rule out negative urinary tract infections

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 456, 期 -, 页码 31-35

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.02.016

关键词

Urinary tract infection; Urinalysis; Autoanalyzers; Flow cytometry; Automated urine sediment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are highly prevalent in nosocomial and community settings, and their diagnosis is costly and time-consuming. Screening methods represent an important advance towards the final UTI diagnosis, diminishing inappropriate treatment or clinical complications. Automated analyzers have been developed and commercialized to screen and rule out negative urine samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate two of these automated analyzers (SediMax, an automatic sediment analyzer and UF-1000i a flow cytometer) to predict negative urine cultures. A total of 1934 urine samples were analyzed. A very strong correlation for white blood cells (WBC) (r(s): 0.928) and a strong correlation for bacteria (BAC) (r(s): 0.693) were obtained. We also calculated optimal cut-off points for both autoanalyzers: 18 WBC/mu L and 97 BAC/mu L for SediMax (sensitivity = 96.25%, specificity = 63.04%, negative predictive value = 97.97%), and 40 WBC/mu L and 460 BAC/mu L for OF-1000i (sensitivity = 98.13%, specificity = 79.16%, negative predictive value = 99.18%). The use of SediMax and UF-1000i resulted in a 46.33% and 57.19% reduction of all samples cultured, respectively. In conclusion, both analyzers are good UTI screening tools in our setting. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据