4.5 Review

Call for a paradigm shift in the design of universal influenza vaccines by harnessing multiple correlates of protection

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DISCOVERY
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 1441-1455

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1801629

关键词

Antibody effector function; broadly neutralizing antibodies; influenza virus; live attenuated influenza vaccine; non-neutralizing antibody; universal influenza vaccine

资金

  1. Andong National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction The genetic variability and diversity of influenza viruses, and the expansion of their hosts, present a significant threat to human health. The development of a universal influenza vaccine is urgently needed to tackle seasonal epidemics, pandemics, vaccine mismatch, and zoonotic transmissions to humans. Areas covered Despite the identification of broadly neutralizing antibodies against influenza viruses, designing a universal influenza vaccine that induces such broadly neutralizing antibodies at protective levels in humans has remained challenging. Besides neutralizing antibodies, multiple correlates of protection have recently emerged as crucially important for eliciting broad protection against diverse influenza viruses. This review discusses the immune responses required for broad protection against influenza viruses, and suggests a paradigm shift from an HA stalk-based approach to other approaches that can induce multiple immunological correlates of protection for the development of a universal influenza vaccine. Expert opinion To develop a truly universal influenza vaccine, multiple correlates of protection should be considered, including antibody responses and T cell immunity. Balanced induction of neutralizing antibodies, antibody effector functions, and T cell immunity will contribute to the most effective vaccination strategy. Live-attenuated influenza vaccines provide an attractive platform to improve the breadth and potency of vaccines for broader protection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据