4.7 Article

Electroactive magnetic microparticles for the selective elimination of cesium ions in the wastewater

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 185, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109474

关键词

Prussian blue; Magnetic electroactive microparticles; Electrochemically switched ion exchange (ESIX) technique; Radioactive cesium; Selectivity

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI, Japan [15K06532, 19K12395]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21476156, 21776191, 21706181]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K06532] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve operability as well as the removal efficiency for cesium ions in the wastewater treatment, a novel electrochemically switched ion exchange (ESIX) technique by using electroactive Prussian-blue(PB)-based magnetic microparticles (PB@Fe3O4 microparticle) with different uniform particle sizes in the range of 300-900 nm as the adsorption materials was developed. The obtained PB@Fe3O4 microparticle were characterized by Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Transmission electron microscope (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). It is found that the PB can be well coated on the surface of Fe3O4 microsphere, which can be easily adsorbed on the magnetic electrode substrate for the electrochemical adsorption of Cs+ ions. Electrochemical adsorption of 97% Cs+ on PB/Fe3O4 was achieved in less than 10 min, and the maximum adsorption capacity was 16.13 mg/g, and the distribution coefficient (KD) of Cs+ ions reached as high as 3938. In addition, the electrochemical adsorption behavior of PB@Fe3O4 microparticle fitted well with the Freundlich adsorption isotherm and the Pseudo-second-order kinetic models. It is expected that such an ESIX technique using PB@Fe3O4 microparticle can be applied for the separation and recovery of dilute Cs+ ions from cesium-contaminated solution in a practical process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据