4.7 Article

Discussion on the allowable safety factor of slope stability for high rockfill dams in China

期刊

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105666

关键词

Rockfill dams; Slope stability; Reliability; Safety factor

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0401907]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51909181]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The allowable safety factors of slope stability for rockfill dams in Chinese design codes are defined irrespective of dam heights and are mainly based on the engineering experiences with respect to the rockfill dams which are lower than 200 m. It is well known that safety margins for different structures are not comparable when safety factors are taken as the measure of safety margin. Thus whether the current allowable safety factors are applicable to the rockfill dams with heights of over 200 m has been controversial in the engineering and academic field. Reliability is well known as a unified measure of safety margin for different structures. Therefore, the slope safety margins of rockfill dams with different heights can be compared in terms of slope reliability indices derived from probabilistic methods. Based on the statistical analysis of nonlinear shear strength parameters of rockfills from 14 Chinese dams, the slope reliabilities of fictitious rockfill dams of different heights designed with equal allowable safety factor are calculated and compared in this paper. It is shown that the slope failure risk of higher dams is larger than that of lower dams if the dams are designed with equal allowable safety factor rather than equal reliability. Therefore, from the perspective of maintaining consistent slope reliability levels among rockfill dams with different heights, the allowable safety factors should be prescribed in terms of dam height, i.e. the allowable safety factor for higher dams should be larger than that for lower dams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据