4.7 Article

Enhancement of energy efficiency by exhaust gas recirculation with oxygen-rich combustion in a natural gas combined cycle with a carbon capture process

期刊

ENERGY
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117586

关键词

Natural gas combined cycle (NGCC); Carbon capture process (CCP); Capture cost; Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR); Oxygen-rich combustion

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2019K1A4A7A03113187]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019K1A4A7A03113187] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enhance the energy efficiency in a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) integrated with a chemical solvent-based carbon capture process (CCP), application of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) with oxygen-rich (oxygen + air) combustion was studied. As the first step, performance of the CCP and its impact on the efficiency of the NGCC were evaluated by validated rigorous models. Net power generation of an NGCC with a CCP was 533 MW at 90% capture rate. Total capture cost was approximately 46.5 USD/ton of CO2. When the EGR, known to improve the performance, was applied, enhancement of the net power generation was limited by 1% (538 MW) because utilization of excessive EGR can be a problem for stable operation of the gas turbine in NGCC. To further improve the EGR, therefore, feasibility of oxygen-rich (oxygen + air) combustion was investigated. The net power generation increased up to 555 MW, which improved about 4% than the original case. In addition, the results indicated that the unconditional mixing of oxygen can rather reduce the net power generation, and optimal composition of the oxygen-rich mixture gas is important. This study exhibited potential ways to improve the efficiency of an NGCC with a CCP. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据