4.7 Article

Eco-evolutionary dynamics of range expansion

期刊

ECOLOGY
卷 101, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3139

关键词

biological invasion; dispersal evolution; eco-evolutionary dynamics; life history evolution; range expansion

类别

资金

  1. Canadian Institute for Ecology and Evolution
  2. Sevilleta LTER award [NSF-DEB-1748133]
  3. NSF [OISE-1159097]
  4. USDA-NIFA Hatch project [1017601]
  5. Michigan State University AgBioResearch
  6. NSERC
  7. UBC International Doctoral Fellowship
  8. [NSF-DEB-1501814]
  9. [NSF-DEB-1555883]
  10. [NSF-DEB-0949595]
  11. [NSF-DEB-1457660]
  12. [NSF-DEB-1601333]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the movement of species' ranges is a classic ecological problem that takes on urgency in this era of global change. Historically treated as a purely ecological process, range expansion is now understood to involve eco-evolutionary feedbacks due to spatial genetic structure that emerges as populations spread. We synthesize empirical and theoretical work on the eco-evolutionary dynamics of range expansion, with emphasis on bridging directional, deterministic processes that favor evolved increases in dispersal and demographic traits with stochastic processes that lead to the random fixation of alleles and traits. We develop a framework for understanding the joint influence of these processes in changing the mean and variance of expansion speed and its underlying traits. Our synthesis of recent laboratory experiments supports the consistent role of evolution in accelerating expansion speed on average, and highlights unexpected diversity in how evolution can influence variability in speed: results not well predicted by current theory. We discuss and evaluate support for three classes of modifiers of eco-evolutionary range dynamics (landscape context, trait genetics, and biotic interactions), identify emerging themes, and suggest new directions for future work in a field that stands to increase in relevance as populations move in response to global change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据