4.4 Article

Flufenamic acid alleviates sepsis-induced lung injury by up-regulatingCBR1

期刊

DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH
卷 81, 期 7, 页码 885-892

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ddr.21706

关键词

CBR1; flufenamic acid; lung injury; sepsis

资金

  1. Shandong Medical and Health Technology Development Program [2016WS0267]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Investigate the effect of flufenamic acid (FFA) on lung injury of sepsis rats. Rat sepsis model was established using cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). The pathomorphology of lung tissue was detected by Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining. The expression levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and high mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1) in serum and TNF-alpha, IL-6, malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in lung tissues. The viability of RLE-6TN cells was detected by CCK-8 assay. The expression of carbonyl reductase 1 (CBR1) in RLE-6TN cells was analyzed by Western blot analysis and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis. The inflammatory response was obviously enhanced in CLP-constructed sepsis rats and alleviated by FFA treatment. Sepsis induced the increase of W/D ratio, promoted the levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, HMGBR1, and MDA and inhibited the levels of SOD and GSH. FFA could effectively alleviate the sepsis-induced lung injury. The viability of RLE-6TN cells induced by LPS was improved with the treatment of FFA. CBR1 expression in LPS-induced RLE-6TN cells was decreased and FFA could up-regulate the CBR1 expression. In addition, LPS-induced lung injury promoted the inflammatory response in lung tissues, increased the W/D ratio and levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, HMGBR1, and MDA while inhibited the levels of SOD and GSH. FFA could effectively improve the LPS-induced lung injury while the effect of FFA on LPS-induced lung injury was alleviated by CBR1 interference. FFA may alleviate sepsis-induced lung injury by up-regulating CBR1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据