4.7 Article

Compression experiment and numerical evaluation on mechanical responses of the lattice structures with stochastic geometric defects originated from additive-manufacturing

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108030

关键词

Lattice structure; Geometric defects; Mechanical properties; Deformation modes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11802030, 11802031, 11902031]
  2. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project [Z181100004118002]
  3. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2018M641207, 2018M641208, 2019M650503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The additive-manufacturing process generally fabricates lattices with geometries that depart from their asdesigned counterparts and some inherent geometric imperfections exist within the fabricated lattice samples. In this paper, mechanical responses of the lattice structures with stochastic geometric defects originated from additive-manufacturing were examined. Here, X-ray Computed tomography (CT) was employed to capture the morphology and distribution of process-induced defects in order to study their role in the elastic response, damage initiation, and failure evolution under quasi-static compression. Testing results indicated that more geometric imperfections exist in the horizontal struts than in the diagonal or vertical struts. Then, extracted from the X-ray CT images, the process-induced defects (i.e. strut porosity, strut thickness variation and strut waviness) were introduced into the ideal finite element (FE) model for establishing the statistical FE model. A much more agreement is observed between the statistical FE model predicted results and experimental results. Finally, the roles of the single geometric defect on the mechanical responses and energy absorption of the lattices were investigated. It was indicated that strut thickness variation in the lattice structures has a larger impact in energy absorption than strut porosity or strut waviness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据