4.7 Article

Nickel (II) modified porous boron nitride: An effective adsorbent for tetracycline removal from aqueous solution

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 394, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124985

关键词

Boron nitride; Nickel modify; Tetracycline; Adsorption mechanism; DFT calculation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772075]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2018202129]
  3. Key Program of Hebei Province Higher Education Science and Technology Researh Foundation [ZD2018082]
  4. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [PCSIRT: IRT17R33]
  5. Innovation Fund for Excellent Graduate Student of Hebei Province [CXZZBS2019039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contamination of aqueous environment caused by various antibiotics has attracted wide attention. It is important to find effective adsorbents for the removal of toxic compounds. Herein, Ni (II) was anchored at the surface of porous boron nitride (BN) by a facile way to enhance the adsorption performance for tetracycline (TC). The interaction between porous BN and Ni (II) was proved to be B-O-Ni bond. It is noteworthy that Ni (II) modified porous BN shows excellent removal percentage up to 99.769% for TC which far exceeds the pristine porous BN (70.853%) and most other reported adsorption materials. The maximum adsorption capacity calculated from the Langmuir model is 429.582 mg g(-1), confirming that Ni (II) modified porous BN has a remarkable performance for removing TC. In addition, the adsorption of TC onto Ni (II) modified porous BN followed pseudo-second-order kinetics and the equilibrium data fitted well with the Freundlich isotherm, revealing that chemisorption and multilayer adsorption was dominated. Finally, the results of DFT calculations further demonstrated that the effective adsorption of TC on Ni (II) modified porous BN could be ascribed to cation bridge interaction, p-p interaction, Van de Waals force and electrostatic interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据