4.3 Article

High throughput solubility and redissolution screening for antibody purification via combinedPEGand zinc chloride precipitation

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.3041

关键词

bioseparations; capture step; monoclonal antibody; protein precipitation; protein solubility

资金

  1. Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Chemical Engineering
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET 1705642]
  3. PPG Industries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As upstream product titers increase, the downstream chromatographic capture step has become a significant downstream bottleneck. Precipitation becomes more attractive under these conditions as the supersaturation driving force increases with the ever-increasing titer. In this study, two precipitating reagents with orthogonal mechanisms, polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a volume excluder and zinc chloride (ZnCl2) as a cross linker, were examined as precipitants for two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), one stable and the other aggregation-prone, in purified drug substance and harvested cell culture fluid forms. Manual batch solubility and redissolution experiments were performed as scouting experiments. A high throughput (HTP) liquid handling system was used to investigate the design space as fully as possible while reducing time, labor, and material requirements. Precipitation and redissolution were studied by systematically varying the concentrations of PEG and ZnCl(2)to identify combinations that resulted in high yield and good quality for the stable mAb; PEG concentrations in the range 7-7.5 wt/vol% together with 10 mM ZnCl(2)gave a yield of 97% and monomer contents of about 93%. While yield for the unstable mAb was high, quality was not acceptable. Performance at selected conditions was further corroborated for the stable mAb using a continuous tubular precipitation reactor at the laboratory scale. The HTP automation system was a powerful tool for locating desired (customized) conditions for antibodies of different physicochemical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据