4.3 Article

A new approach to epithelial-mesenchymal transition diagnostics in epithelial tumors: double immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry

期刊

BIOTECHNIQUES
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 257-263

出版社

FUTURE SCI LTD
DOI: 10.2144/btn-2020-0024

关键词

cytokeratins; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; flow cytometry; immunofluorescent assay; ovarian cancer; prognostic value; solid tumors; vimentin

资金

  1. Ministry of Health of Russia [AAAA-A20-120020500021-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Method summary Double immunofluorescent staining approach for flow cytometry has been developed to study the quantitative vimentin expression in whichde novoexpression is observed only when an epithelium cell enters the EMT. The level of the marker's expression in epithelial cells was determined as the ratio (%) of the number of the cells coexpressing cytokeratins and vimentin to the total number of tumor cells expressing cytokeratins. Clinical validation of the new method was conducted in tumors of narrowly defined cohort of 32 patients: stage III high-grade serous ovarian cancer, suboptimal surgical cytoreduction and platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy. A new method of double immunofluorescent staining for flow cytometry has been created to evaluate quantitative expression of mesenchymal protein vimentin only in epithelial cells of a solid tumor that is a mix of different origin cells.De novo vimentin expression is strongly associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and therefore is a metastatic potential marker of epithelial tumor cells. In comparison with semiquantitative available methods, the proposed one has several advantages, such as the accurate measurement of the marker's expression, and minimization of spatial and temporal tumor heterogeneity. Clinical validation of the method has revealed inverse correlation between the quantitative index of epithelial-mesenchymal transition level and progression-free survival using Kaplan-Meier curves and the COX proportional hazards ratio in 32 ovarian cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据