4.5 Article

Sources of selection and information biases when using commercial database-derived residential histories for cancer research

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 35-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.07.010

关键词

Database; Residence characteristics; Cancer; Sampling bias; Information bias; Demographic factors

资金

  1. University of Illinois Cancer Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study examined potential sources of selection and information biases when using residence history information from a commercial database to construct residential histories for cancer research. Methods: We searched the LexisNexis database for residence data on 3473 adults diagnosed with cancers of the prostate, colon/rectum, and female breast in a single health-care system between 2005 and 2016 using the name and address at diagnosis and the birth date. Residential histories were generated from the results using open-source statistical programs from the National Cancer Institute. Multivariable regression models analyzed the associations of the search results with demographic characteristics and all-cause mortality. Results: Racial/ethnic minorities were less likely to match to vendor residence data compared with non-Hispanic whites (odd ratios [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] for non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islander were 1.66 [1.30, 2.12], 2.92 [2.18, 3.90], and 4.53 [2.72, 7.55], respectively). Being non-Hispanic black was negatively associated with years of residential history (vs. non-Hispanic whites, beta coefficient [95% CI] = -2.57 [-3.40, -1.73]). Not matching to residence data was associated with an increased 5-year odds of death from any cause (vs. matched subjects, odd ratios [95% CI] = 5.92 [4.29, 8.50]). Conclusions: Differential ascertainment of residence history by race/ethnicity and association of ascertainment with prognosis are potential sources of selection and information biases when using residence data from a commercial database. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据