4.8 Article

Chemical Synthesis Elucidates the Key Antigenic Epitope of the Autism-Related BacteriumClostridium bolteaeCapsular Octadecasaccharide

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 59, 期 46, 页码 20529-20537

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202007209

关键词

carbohydrates; glycoconjugates; immunology; polysaccharides; total synthesis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21877052, 21907039]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180030, BK20190575]
  3. National First-class Discipline Program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering [LITE2018-14]
  4. Max Planck Society International Partner Group Program
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  6. Max-Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gut pathogenClostridium bolteaehas been associated with the onset of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To create vaccines againstC. bolteae, it is important to identify exact protective epitopes of the immunologically active capsular polysaccharide (CPS). Here, a series ofC. bolteaeCPS glycans, up to an octadecasaccharide, was prepared. Key to achieving the total syntheses is a [2+2] coupling strategy based on a beta-d-Rhap-(1 -> 3)-alpha-d-Manprepeating unit that in turn was accessed by a stereoselective beta-d-rhamnosylation. The 4,6-O-benzylidene-induced conformational locking is a powerful strategy for forming a beta-d-mannose-type glycoside. An indirect strategy based on C2 epimerization of beta-d-quinovoside was efficiently achieved by Swern oxidation and borohydride reduction. Sequential glycosylation, and regioselective and global deprotection produced the disaccharide and tetrasaccharide, up to the octadecasaccharide. Glycan microarray analysis of sera from rabbits immunized with inactivatedC. bolteaebacteria revealed a humoral immune response to the di- and tetrasaccharide, but none of the longer sequences. The tetrasaccharide may be a key motif for designing glycoconjugate vaccines againstC. bolteae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据