4.7 Article

Healthcare use, work loss and total costs in incident and prevalent Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: results from a nationwide study in Sweden

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 655-668

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.15889

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [R03 DK113337]
  2. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Pfizer Young IBD Investigator Grant
  3. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background There are limited data on population-wide assessment of cost in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Aim To estimate the societal cost of actively treated CD and UC in Sweden. Methods We identified 10 117 prevalent CD and 19 762 prevalent UC patients, aged >= 18 years on 1 January 2014 and 4028 adult incident CD cases and 8659 adult incident UC cases (2010-2013) from Swedish Patient Register. Each case was matched to five population comparators. Healthcare costs were calculated from medications, outpatient visits, hospitalisations and surgery. Cost of productivity losses was derived from disability pension and sick leave. Results The mean annual societal costs per working-age patient (18-64 years) with CD and UC were $22 813 (vs $7533 per comparator) and $14 136 (vs $7351 per comparator) respectively. In patients aged >= 65 years, the mean annual costs of CD and UC were $9726 and $8072 vs $3875 and $4016 per comparator respectively. The majority of cost for both CD (56%) and UC (59%) patients originated from productivity losses. Higher societal cost of working-age CD patients as compared to UC patients was related to greater utilisation of anti-TNF (22.2% vs 7.4%) and increased annual disability pension (44 days vs 25 days). Among incident CD and UC patients, the mean total cost over the first year per patient was over three times higher than comparators. Conclusion In Sweden, the societal cost of incident and prevalent CD and UC patients was consistently two to three times higher than the general population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据