4.2 Article

Molecular Identification of a Novel Species,Babesia panickerisp. nov., from a Naturally Infected Domestic Cat of India and Its Comparison with CanineBabesiaIsolates

期刊

ACTA PARASITOLOGICA
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 913-918

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.2478/s11686-020-00228-9

关键词

Babesiosis; ssrRNA gene; Indian feline isolate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Babesiosis is a tick-borne hemo-parasitic disease of domestic and wild animals. Parasites causing babesiosis are considered to infect only specific hosts but some sporadic reports in recent past are in strong disagreement with their host specificity. This is the first report of a domestic cat being naturally infected with a novelBabesiasp. in India. Methods Blood samples collected from dogs (n = 6) and a 3-month-old cat, with clinical symptoms of babesiosis, were submitted to two different laboratories for hematology analysis, light microscopical examination, and molecular confirmation ofBabesiasp. using PCR, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis. Results Hematological alterations noticed in canine and feline samples were severe anemia and thrombocytopenia. Pear-shaped merozoites were visualized on light microscopic examination of both canine and feline blood smears. Size of the merozoites in feline blood sample was smaller when compared to canine samples. Molecular analysis usingBabesiaspecies-specific primers showed that all canine samples were positive forB. vogeliand feline sample was negative forB. canis,B. rossi, andB. vogeliinfecting dogs. Amplification and sequencing of full-length ssrRNA using universal apicomplexan primers followed by molecular and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Indian domestic cat was infected with a novelBabesiasp. Conclusion This work presents the first molecular and phylogenetic evidence of a novelBabesiasp. causing feline babesiosis in a naturally infected domestic cat in India. We propose to name this novel species asBabesia panickerisp. nov.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据