4.6 Article

Geomicrobial Investigations of Colored Outer Coatings from an Ethiopian Rock Art Gallery

期刊

COATINGS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings10060536

关键词

bacterial community; rock art; rock coating; SEM-EDS; subaerial biofilms; CLSM; 16S rRNA gene sequencing

资金

  1. (H)ORIGN Project - Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research (MIUR) [RBSI142SRD]
  2. Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research (MIUR) through the project Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022 (WP4-Risorse del Patrimonio Culturale) of the Universita degli Studi di Milano
  3. Ministry of Education, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The open rock shelter of Yabelo in Ethiopia hosts diverse Holocene paintings of great cultural importance. The paintings are characterized by the presence of different mineral coatings, whose features have not been studied yet. Our goal was to understand whether different rock samples from the Yabelo paintings collected in close proximity may reveal coatings with different minerology and biology. Thus, elemental analyses combined with microscopic and molecular investigations were performed on two coatings, one whitish (sample 1) and one reddish (sample 2). Although both samples were dominated by heterotrophic bacteria, the two coatings showed distinct mineralogical and microbiological characteristics. Sample 1 contained higher amounts of Ca and P than sample 2, which was likely related to the presence of organic matter. Sample 1 hosted bacterial genera that are potentially involved in biomineralization processes, metal redox cycles and metal resistance. In contrast, sample 2 showed mainly pathogenic and commensal bacteria that are characteristic of animal and human microbiota, and other microorganisms that are involved in nitrogen and metal biogeochemical cycles. Overall, our results indicated that the bacterial communities were particular to the coating mineralogy, suggesting a potential role of the biological components in the crust genesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据