4.6 Article

Design, Experiment, and Improvement of a Quasi-Zero-Stiffness Vibration Isolation System

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10072273

关键词

vibration isolation; quasi-zero-stiffness; magnetic rings spring; transmissibility; improvement of the load capacity

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1302200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1613224]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2019B090915001]
  4. KEY Laboratory of Robotics and Intelligent Equipment of Guangdong Regular Institutions of Higher Education [2017KSYS009]
  5. DGUT (Dongguan University of Technology) innovation center of robotics and intelligent equipment of China [KCYCXPT2017006]
  6. Shenzhen Research and Development Program of China [JSGG20180504170011639]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new kind of quasi-zero-stiffness (QZS) isolation system that has the property of low-dynamic but high-static stiffness. The negative stiffness was produced using two magnetic rings, the magnetization of which is axial. First, the force-displacement characteristic of the two coupled magnetic rings was developed and the relationship between the parameters of the magnetic rings and the stiffness of the system was investigated. Then, the dynamic response of the QZS was analyzed. The force transmissibility of the system was calculated and the effects of the damping ratio and excitation amplitude on the isolation performance were investigated. The prototype of the QZS system was developed to verify the isolation effects of the system based on a comparison with a linear vibration isolation platform. Lastly, the improvement of the QZS system was conducted based on changing the heights of the ring magnets and designing a proper non-linear spring. The analysis shows the QZS system after improvement shows better isolation effects than that of the non-improved system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据