4.5 Article

Production Research as Key Factor for Successful Establishment of Battery Production on the Example of Large-Scale Automotive Cells Containing Nickel-Rich LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 Electrodes

期刊

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202000183

关键词

large-format cells; lithium-ion batteries; NMC811; PHEV-1

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03XP0132C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increased focus on electromobility in European countries is closely linked to the establishment of local lithium-ion battery (LIB) mass production facilities, such as Tesla's Gigafactory 1 in Nevada. While extensive knowledge in LIB lab-scale assembly already exists, the transfer to industry-scale production is an area of challenge that is tackled through intense production research. Slurries of nickel-rich NMC811 that is sensitive to environmental conditions, and therefore more difficult to process, are successfully up-scaled to 65 kg industry-scale batches and investigated through rheological measurements. Defect-free, double-side-coated electrodes with approximate to 400 m in length are obtained via slot-die coating and assembled into large-scale PHEV-1 cells with graphite as the counter electrode. Possible production-induced defects are examined through computed tomography (CT). The obtained qualified, automotive cells are investigated through galvanostatic charge/discharge testing that confirms excellent cycling performance with discharge capacities of 26.3 Ah (1st cycle) and 25.4 Ah (300th cycle), which corresponds to a capacity retention of 96.6%. These results are compared with NMC811-containing cells from lab-scale/literature, and large-scale products (slurries, electrodes, and PHEV-1 cells) containing the predecessor material NMC622. The scalability of slurry preparation, electrode production, and cell assembly with special emphasis on differences between lab-scale and industry-scale production is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据