4.6 Article

Life Cycle Assessment and Technoeconomic Analysis of Thermochemical Conversion Technologies Applied to Poultry Litter with Energy and Nutrient Recovery

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 22, 页码 8436-8447

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c02860

关键词

life cycle assessment; technoeconomic analysis; thermochemical technologies; poultry litter; waste-to-energy

资金

  1. Cornell University's David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermochemical technologies provide promising pathways to recover energy and reduce environmental impacts from biomass wastes. Poultry manure or litter additionally provides an opportunity for recovering and recycling nutrients and producing valuable soil amendments. This study compared the life cycle environmental impacts and technoeconomic performance of six thermochemical technologies for treating poultry litter waste-slow pyrolysis, fast pyrolysis, gasification, hydrothermal liquefaction, hydrothermal carbonization, and supercritical water gasification-with direct land application. Using life cycle assessment (LCA), the technologies were compared through 15 different environmental impact categories (midpoints) using the IMPACT 2002+ method. On converting the midpoints to damage categories (end points), it was found that these technologies outperformed the conventional land application method with respect to human health (92-149% improvement), climate change impact (15-53% improvement), ecosystem quality (124-160% improvement), and resource depletion (-24-530% improvement). The technoeconomic analysis (TEA) identified carbon price (breakeven of $127/1000 kg CO2 equiv for slow pyrolysis) and high capital costs as influential parameters for large-scale applications of these technologies. The TEA results were most sensitive to carbon price and transportation distance (0.69 and 0.52% changes in revenue per change in input, respectively).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据