4.7 Article

Selenoprotein P as Biomarker of Selenium Status in Clinical Trials with Therapeutic Dosages of Selenite

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu12041067

关键词

supplementation; trace element; monitoring; chemotherapy; adjuvant treatment

资金

  1. Cancerfonden [180429]
  2. Cancer-och Allergifonden [206]
  3. Stockholm County Council (ALF)
  4. Jochnick Foundation
  5. Karolinska Institutet [171023]
  6. Radiumhemmets Forskningsfonder [171023]
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [2558, 849/6-1, SPP 1629, HO 5096/2-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selenoprotein P (SELENOP) is an established biomarker of selenium (Se) status. Serum SELENOP becomes saturated with increasing Se intake, reaching maximal concentrations of 5-7 mg SELENOP/L at intakes of ca. 100-150 mu g Se/d. A biomarker for higher Se intake is missing. We hypothesized that SELENOP may also reflect Se status in clinical applications of therapeutic dosages of selenite. To this end, blood samples from two supplementation studies employing intravenous application of selenite at dosages >1 mg/d were analyzed. Total Se was quantified by spectroscopy, and SELENOP by a validated ELISA. The high dosage selenite infusions increased SELENOP in parallel to elevated Se concentrations relatively fast to final values partly exceeding 10 mg SELENOP/L. Age or sex were not related to the SELENOP increase. Western blot analyses of SELENOP verified the results obtained by ELISA, and indicated an unchanged pattern of immunoreactive protein isoforms. We conclude that the saturation of SELENOP concentrations observed in prior studies with moderate Se dosages (<400 g/d) may reflect an intermediate plateau of expression, rather than an absolute upper limit. Circulating SELENOP seems to be a suitable biomarker for therapeutic applications of selenite exceeding the recommended upper intake levels. Whether SELENOP is also capable of reflecting other supplemental selenocompounds in high dosage therapeutic applications remains to be investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据