4.3 Article

Scleral thinning surgery for bullous retinal detachment with retinal pigment epithelial tear in central serous chorioretinopathy: a case report

期刊

BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01409-w

关键词

Bullous serous retinal detachment; Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy; Pachychoroid; Retinal pigment epithelial; Sclerectomies; Scleral thinning surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Bullous serous retinal detachment (RD) with retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) tear is a rare and severe variant of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Due to its atypical presentation, it may raise diagnostic issues, leading to inappropriate therapeutic procedures. The optimum treatment for this CSC variant is still uncertain. Case presentation A 65-year-old male was referred for vitreo-retinal surgery with a provisional diagnosis of rhegmatogenous RD in his right eye. Dilated fundus examination showed an inferior bullous RD with no evidence of retinal breaks, while a large RPE tear was detected in the temporal quadrant. Ocular ultrasound showed no mass lesion. The axial length was 23.63 mm. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) revealed a pachychoroid pattern in both eyes. The patient referred a history of CSC in the right eye and the recent use of intravenous corticosteroids for bronchitis. Laser therapy and photodynamic therapy were not applicable due to the extension and elevation of the RD. Two months after oral treatment with eplerenone, the subretinal fluid increased significantly. The patient underwent two 4 x 4 mm deep lamellar sclerectomies in the inferior quadrants. The surgical treatment resulted in complete RD resolution. Conclusion A correct diagnosis of bullous variant of chronic CSC with RPE tear is critical to avoid inappropriate procedures and to prevent severe visual loss as a result of neuroretinal damage. Scleral thinning surgery may be considered a valid option, resulting in rapid and long-lasting resolution of RD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据