4.4 Article

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration and acute kidney injury after noncardiac surgery

期刊

BMC NEPHROLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01808-7

关键词

Acute kidney injury; High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Noncardiac surgery; Risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Abnormal High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration is closely related to postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgeries. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration and acute kidney injury after non-cardiac surgeries. Method This was a single-center cohort study for elective non-cardiac non-kidney surgery from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2017. The endpoint was the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) 7 days postoperatively in the hospital. Preoperative serum High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentration was examined by multivariate logistic regression models before and after propensity score weighting analysis. Results Of the 74,284 surgeries, 4.4% (3159 cases) suffered acute kidney injury. The odds ratio for HDL (0.96-1.14 as reference, < 0.96, 1.14-1.35, > 1.35) was 1.28 (1.14-1.41), P < 0.001; 0.91 (0.80-1.03), P = 0.150; 0.75 (0.64-0.85), P < 0.001, respectively. Using a dichotomized cutoff point for propensity analysis, Preoperative serum HDL < 1.03 mmol/L (> 1.03 as reference) was associated with increased risk of postoperative AKI, with odds ratio 1.40 (1.27 similar to 1.52), P < 0.001 before propensity score weighting, and 1.32 (1.21-1.46), P < 0.001 after propensity score weighting. Sensitivity analysis with other cut values of HDL showed similar results. Conclusions Using multivariate regression analyses before and after propensity score weighting, in addition to multiple sensitivity analysis methods, this study found that following non-cardiac surgery, low HDL cholesterol levels were independent risk factors for AKI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据