4.4 Article

Spin structure relation to phase contrast imaging of isolated magnetic Bloch and Neel skyrmions

期刊

ULTRAMICROSCOPY
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.112973

关键词

Skyrmion; Lorentz TEM; Phase contrast; Magnetic imaging

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) via SPP2137
  2. European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR) [17FUN08]
  3. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC-2111 390814868]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11574018, 61627813]
  6. International Collaboration Project [B16001]
  7. National Key Technology Program of China [2017ZX01032101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic skyrmions are promising candidates for future storage devices with a large data density. A great variety of materials have been found that host skyrmions up to the room-temperature regime. Lorentz microscopy, usually performed in a transmission electron microscope (TEM), is one of the most important tools for characterizing skyrmion samples in real space. Using numerical calculations, this work relates the phase contrast in a TEM to the actual magnetization profile of an isolated Neel or Bloch skyrmion, the two most common skyrmion types. Within the framework of the used skyrmion model, the results are independent of skyrmion size and wall width and scale with sample thickness for purely magnetic specimens. Simple rules are provided to extract the actual skyrmion configuration of pure Bloch or Neel skyrmions without the need of simulations. Furthermore, first differential phase contrast (DPC) measurements on Neel skyrmions that meet experimental expectations are presented and showcase the described principles. The work is relevant for material sciences where it enables the engineering of skyrmion profiles via convenient characterization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据