Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer
出版年份 2020 全文链接
标题
Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer
作者
关键词
-
出版物
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
发表日期
2020-05-21
DOI
10.1007/s00464-020-07638-w
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Educational step-by-step surgical video about operative technique in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) at University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC): 17 steps standardized technique—Lessons learned since the first worldwide RPD performed in the year 2001
- (2020) Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis
- (2019) Quisette P Janssen et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas: a Propensity-Matched Analysis
- (2019) Jianpeng Cai et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
- Management of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
- (2019) Bradley N. Reames et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- The Miami International Evidence-Based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection
- (2019) Horacio J. Asbun et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Oncologic Outcomes After Robotic Pancreatic Resections Are Not Inferior to Open Surgery
- (2019) Mark D. Girgis et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- The impact of high body mass index on patients undergoing robotic pancreatectomy: A propensity matched analysis
- (2019) Shengliang He et al. SURGERY
- A Combination of Robotic Approach and ERAS Pathway Optimizes Outcomes and Cost for Pancreatoduodenectomy
- (2018) Stacy J. Kowalsky et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel for Neoadjuvant Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma
- (2018) Mashaal Dhir et al. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy at an experienced institution is not associated with an increased risk of post-pancreatic hemorrhage
- (2018) Deepa Magge et al. HPB
- Evolution of a Novel Robotic Training Curriculum in a Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship
- (2018) L. Mark Knab et al. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
- Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis
- (2017) Ibrahim Nassour et al. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY
- Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes
- (2017) Ibrahim Nassour et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Robotic approach mitigates perioperative morbidity in obese patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy
- (2017) Mark D. Girgis et al. HPB
- A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula
- (2017) Matthew T. McMillan et al. JAMA Surgery
- A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- (2016) Amer H. Zureikat et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy
- (2016) Long Peng et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comprehensive review
- (2016) Mingjun Wang et al. International Journal of Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer
- (2015) Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
- (2014) Kristopher P. Croome et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- 250 Robotic Pancreatic Resections
- (2013) Amer H. Zureikat et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started