4.7 Article

Prx2 (Peroxiredoxin 2) as a Cause of Hydrocephalus After Intraventricular Hemorrhage

期刊

STROKE
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 1578-1586

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028672

关键词

animals; brain; brain injuries; macrophages; rats

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS-091545, NS-090925, NS-096917, NS-106746, NS-112394]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose- Our recent study demonstrated that release of Prx2 (peroxiredoxin 2) from red blood cells (RBCs) is involved in the inflammatory response and brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage. The current study investigated the role of extracellular Prx2 in hydrocephalus development after experimental intraventricular hemorrhage. Methods- There were 4 parts in this study. First, Sprague-Dawley rats received an intraventricular injection of lysed RBC or saline and were euthanized at 1 hour for Prx2 measurements. Second, rats received an intraventricular injection of Prx2, deactivated Prx2, or saline. Third, lysed RBC was coinjected with conoidin A, a Prx2 inhibitor, or vehicle. Fourth, rats received Prx2 injection and were treated with minocycline or saline (i.p.). The effects of Prx2 and the inhibitors were examined using magnetic resonance imaging assessing ventriculomegaly, histology assessing ventricular wall damage, and immunohistochemistry to assess inflammation, particularly at the choroid plexus. Results- Intraventricular injection of lysed RBC resulted in increased brain Prx2 and hydrocephalus. Intraventricular injection of Prx2 alone caused hydrocephalus, ventricular wall damage, activation of choroid plexus epiplexus cells (macrophages), and an accumulation of neutrophils. Conoidin A attenuated lysed RBC-induced injury. Systemic minocycline treatment reduced the epiplexus cell activation and hydrocephalus induced by Prx2. Conclusions- Prx2 contributed to the intraventricular hemorrhage-induced hydrocephalus, probably by inducing inflammatory responses in choroid plexus and ventricular wall damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据