4.7 Article

Ozonation of rivaroxaban production waste water and comparison of generated transformation products with known in vivo and in vitro metabolites

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 714, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136825

关键词

Process waste water; Acetoxamide; Waste water treatment; Rate constants; Ecotoxicology

资金

  1. Ministry of Innovation, Sciences, Research and Technology of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During production of rivaroxaban, an orally administrated anticoagulant, process waste water is generated at several stages of manufacturing. Due to low biodegradability in conventional waste water treatment plants, it is currently incinerated. Thus, new pre-treatment methods for rivaroxaban-containing waste water could facilitate its subsequent biological processing. In this study, ozonation was investigated as the pre-treatment method, with special emphasis on the elimination of the target compound and the generation of its main transformation products. These were determined by high performance liquid chromatography - high resolution mass spectrometry (HPLC-HRMS). Our results show that the concentration of rivaroxaban in the ozonated waste water can be effectively reduced (below detection limit) under acidic conditions, whereas neutral or basic reaction environment proved less suitable. Four main transformation products were identified and their concentrations determined. Rivaroxaban and its most prominent transformation product acetoxamide were elucidated in multiple-stage mass spectrometry (MSn) experiments. Transformation products derived from the degradation of rivaroxaban were then compared to its natural (animal and human) metabolites as well as other known derivatives. In contrast to previously published rivaroxaban-derived metabolites, the presented ozonation experiments resulted in new transformation products. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据