4.7 Article

Rare earth elements in surface specific urban runoff in Northern Beijing

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 717, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136969

关键词

Particulate REE; Urban fingerprint; LREE Source of REE; Rain events; Cerium

资金

  1. Sino -Danish Center for Education and Research (SDC), University of Copenhagen
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41571473]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rare earth elements (REEs) have been increasingly diffused to the environment through mining activities and theextensive use in modern commodities, vehicular activities, coal burning and various environmental and agricultural applications. Studies of REEs in urban environments are limited with no data on REEs in urban runoff. To investigate the concentration and distribution of REEs, a total of 150 runoff samples were collected from trafficked areas, rooftops and residential parking lots in a moderate to densely populated area in Beijing, China. The runoff samples were separated into dissolved and particulate phases and analyzed by ICP-MS. The REEs were mainly (N80%) found in the runoff particulate material. The sum of REEs (Sigma REE) total concentrations in urban stormwater runoff samples ranged from 0.16 to 185 mu g/l. The observed mean total concentration of SREE in the runoff samples were 3-14 folds higher and dissolved fractions 1.5 to 6 times higher than published concentrations for recipients such as sewage channels and rivers. The distribution of REEs in runoff was dominated by light REE. Cluster analysis and Pearson's correlations revealed a strong association between the individual REEs pointing to a similar source. Higher Ce concentrations compared to other REEs indicated strong influence from traffic emission particulates. The La/Sm (5.90-8.05), La/Ce (0.53-0.58) and Ce/Yb (31.0-42.7) ratios pointed to REE sources from traffic emissions and coal burning thus defining an urban fingerprint. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据