4.1 Article

Seasonal reproduction of the blue mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from two locations in southern New Zealand

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2020.1757472

关键词

Mytilus galloprovincialis; blue mussel; reproduction; gametogenesis; condition index; New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blue mussels in New Zealand coastal ecosystems show spatial variation in reproductive biology, with similar seasonality in reproduction across different populations. Spawning occurs in spring and summer months, while gametogenic development takes place in autumn and early winter. Spatial differences in reproduction coincide with variations in phytoplankton food abundance.
Blue mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis, are a widespread and ecologically important species in New Zealand coastal ecosystems, yet, there is limited information on the seasonality and variability in reproduction among populations. The reproductive cycle of M. galloprovincialis was studied monthly over 1-year in two southern New Zealand populations (Aramoana (45.7787 degrees S, 170.7037 degrees E) and Timaru (44.3905 degrees S, 171.2498 degrees E)). Tissue indices were determined, and gonads examined histologically. At both sites, males and females displayed synchronous changes in condition indices and gonad indices, with both indices generally greater in the Timaru population than in the Aramoana population. Both sampling sites presented with comparable seasonality of reproduction with spawning over spring and summer months (September to February). Gametogenic development occurred over the autumn and early-winter period (March to August). Spatial differences in reproduction coincided with differences in phytoplankton food abundance (greater in Timaru), while there were only small differences in sea temperatures between sites. This study indicates the likelihood of spatial variation in reproductive biology between M. galloprovincialis populations, even across small spatial scales (<200 km).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据