4.3 Article

Maintenance of natalizumab during the first trimester of pregnancy in active multiple sclerosis

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 712-718

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458520912637

关键词

Active multiple sclerosis; pregnancy; natalizumab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparing two strategies of stopping natalizumab in the first trimester or at conception for women with active multiple sclerosis planning pregnancy, the study found that maintaining natalizumab during the first trimester may reduce the risk of disease reactivation during pregnancy.
Background: Planning pregnancy in patients with active multiple sclerosis (MS) is highly challenging because treatment withdrawn may be associated with dramatic disease reactivation. Objective: To compare two strategies for women with active MS who were planning pregnancy: stopping natalizumab (1) at the end of the first trimester and (2) at conception. Methods: Standardized strategy for women with active MS was initiated in our department. Maintenance of natalizumab until the end of first trimester was recommended (secured first trimester (SFT)). When patients refused, they were advised to continue until conception (secured conception (SC)). Predictors of disease activity during pregnancy were assessed. Results: Forty-six pregnancies were prospectively followed (30 with SFT and 16 with SC). One congenital anomaly occurred in the SC group. The proportions of patients with relapse and disability progression during pregnancy were lower in the SFT than in the SC group (3.6% vs 38.5%, p < 0.005 and 3.6% vs 30.8%, p < 0.05, respectively). Predictors of relapse and disability progression during pregnancy were the time when natalizumab was stopped (conception vs end of first trimester) and the number of relapses during the year before natalizumab. Conclusion: Maintaining natalizumab during the first trimester may reduce the risk of disease reactivation during pregnancy in patients with active MS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据